For SAT problems with 10 variables and 200 clauses, it usually output SAT as expected, but the assignment was never valid (Examples: first, second). Once it claimed a SAT formula was UNSAT. For this reason I didn't bother testing with more variables for the SAT case.
First FT: the day’s biggest stories
，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
Last May, I wrote a blog post titled As an Experienced LLM User, I Actually Don’t Use Generative LLMs Often as a contrasting response to the hype around the rising popularity of agentic coding. In that post, I noted that while LLMs are most definitely not useless and they can answer simple coding questions faster than it would take for me to write it myself with sufficient accuracy, agents are a tougher sell: they are unpredictable, expensive, and the hype around it was wildly disproportionate given the results I had seen in personal usage. However, I concluded that I was open to agents if LLMs improved enough such that all my concerns were addressed and agents were more dependable.
FT Digital Edition